Affirmative Action in a Two Stage Statistical Discrimination Model
نویسنده
چکیده
We investigate the effect of affirmative action policies in a statistical discrimination model with two stages. A group of workers face discrimination in both hiring and promotion decisions of the firm, and the regulator is free to intervene in both stages. We show that there are affirmative action policies which can eliminate negative employer beliefs by increasing educational investment in the discriminated group. Further, affirmative action imposes a disincentive effect on educational investment only for policies which require the firm to promote workers who are clearly unqualified. Our results show that while it is always beneficial to intervene in the hiring stage, the welfare effect of promotion stage intervention is ambiguous. We subsequently characterize the optimal affirmative action plan and show that the optimal policy may require intervention in both stages. Lastly, we consider the feasibility of introducing affirmative action policies, in terms of ensuring compliance by the firm. We show that arbitrary policies may indeed violate the participation constraint of the firm. Nevertheless, the optimal policy is always feasible, since it allows the firm positive profit.
منابع مشابه
Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey*
This chapter surveys the theoretical literature on statistical discrimination and affirmative action. This literature suggests different explanations for the existence and persistence of group inequality. This survey highlights such differences and describes in these contexts the effects of color-sighted and color-blind affirmative action policies, and the efficiency implications of discriminat...
متن کاملDiscrimination and Affirmative Action
The word discrimination is used loosely to encapsulate negative ideas surrounding the practice. In the case of affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan, discrimination is used to justify an unjust practice. Generally, when affirmative action is debated, it is considered from a singular perspective (i.e., it is wrong or it is right). Most ignore that admissions polici...
متن کاملAffirmative action in a competitive economy
We consider a model of endogenous human capital formation with competitively determined wages. Discrimination is sustainable in equilibrium in the presence of two distinguishable, but ex ante identical groups of workers. An affirmative action policy consisting of a quota may ‘fail’ in the sense that there still may be equilibria where groups are treated differently. However, the incentives to i...
متن کاملComplementary Bias: A Model of Two-Sided Statistical Discrimination
We introduce a model of two-sided statistical discrimination in which worker and firm beliefs are complementary. Firms try to infer whether workers have made investments required for them to be productive, and simultaneously, workers try to deduce whether firms have made investments necessary for them to thrive. When multiple equilibria exist, group differences are sustained by both sides of th...
متن کاملA Cure for Discrimination? Affirmative Action and the Case of California Proposition 209
A Cure for Discrimination? Affirmative Action and the Case of California Proposition 209 Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, ended state affirmative action programs not only in education, but also for public employment and government contracting. This paper uses CPS data and triple difference techniques to take advantage of the natural experimen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009